IBM System x3200 -[4363K1G]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive20.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIBM System x3200 -[4363K1G]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM M31IX
Memory4.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '17 at 22:52
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 3040
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 38.6
30% 40.6 Pts
4-Core 42.2
8-Core 42.9
6% 42.6 Pts
64-Core 21.7
1% 21.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV100S264G 64GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 120504 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 238
Write 107
Mixed 117
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 4.93
4K Mixed 0.37
16% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 30%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 299GB
75GB free
Firmware: 3000
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 159GB
51GB free
Firmware: 3000
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 96.5
Write 50.6
Mixed 72.4
55% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.28
73% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Read 22.3
Write 7.41
Mixed 5.28
12% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.15
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.003
16% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 2.4
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback