Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160119
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJul 28 '18 at 14:53
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 152
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 245
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 7.62
4% 6.38 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 5.87
4% 5.21 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 401
Write 295
Mixed 287
SusWrite 84.4
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 21.9
115% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 132
116% 171 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
171GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 112 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 86
Write 91.1
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 112
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
296GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 96 97 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 93.6
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 98.2
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-H Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback