Asus PRIME X399-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X399-A  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '18 at 13:15
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 904
80% 680 Pts
64-Core 2,426
150% 2,426 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Nvidia(10DE 087E) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 27.6
20% 30 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 25.3
22% 28 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 882 631 633 633 633 631 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,930
Write 1,711
Mixed 794
SusWrite 674
284% 1,277 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 50.1
201% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 965
DQ Write 818
DQ Mixed 735
594% 839 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 219%
Great: 254%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
85GB free
Firmware: 02.03B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 78.5
Write 75.2
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 77.5
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 64%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
142GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 81 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 85.5
Write 77
Mixed 76
SusWrite 80.2
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 76%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
81GB free
Firmware: 04.04V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 91 90 88 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 93.2
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 90.5
62% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
19GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 87 83 82 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 76.8
Write 83.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 84
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 57%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 83 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 84.5
Write 79.7
Mixed 45
SusWrite 83.8
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%
WD Gold 8TB (256MB Cache 2017)-$189
400GB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 141 141 135 134 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 134
Write 133
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 136
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.3
307% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M2D3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.7% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X399-A Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X399-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $983
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback