MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A37
MotherboardMSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)  (all builds)
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '18 at 12:20
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 66.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 172
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 669
60% 507 Pts
64-Core 1,190
74% 1,190 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
Gigabyte(1458 228F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 61.2
Parallax 81.6
55% 69.9 fps
MRender 61.1
Gravity 55
Splatting 77.7
54% 64.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX7000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CB1.1.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 711
Write 805
Mixed 639
161% 718 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 38.5
135% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 317
234% 304 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 126%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
284GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 468 300 253 253 253 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 428
Write 247
Mixed 363
SusWrite 323
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 34.9
119% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 267
212% 295 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD44G240082 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 PSD44G240082 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.5% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 21.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37) Builds (Compare 732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M MORTAR (MS-7A37)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback