ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 2324B67

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo 2324B67 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 2324B67
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '18 at 06:49
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 105 52% 81.8 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 201 26% 197 Pts	64-Core 203 13% 203 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.6% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.27 Parallax 2.75 3% 4.01 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 7.57 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.6% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 146 122 140 79 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 388 Write 189 Mixed 166 SusWrite 122 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 10.7 54% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 13.7 60% 138 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 72%
MXSSD2MMSJTU-64G 63GB 44GB free Firmware: L041 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 77 74 60 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21% Poor	Read 160 Write 68.6 Mixed 82.8 SusWrite 71.8 21% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 5.4 35% 9.37 MB/s

Philips USB Flash Drive 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 3600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 11 14 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	7.6% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 14.3 Mixed 9 SusWrite 12 18% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 30% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.6% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KSH-8G 2x8GB 118 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 17.1 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback