Lenovo 80WK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80WK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171017
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '18 at 17:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 226
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 582
59% 480 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39D1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8875
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 27.3
8% 16.3 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 22.6
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 310 293 307 306 288 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,525
Write 1,213
Mixed 666
SusWrite 329
207% 933 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 57.4
159% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 933
DQ Write 818
DQ Mixed 834
636% 861 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 171%
Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 126 129 128 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 124
Write 45.8
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 127
66% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.3
136% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80WK Builds (Compare 6,979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80WK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback