Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '18 at 00:56
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 134
2-Core 264
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 764
71% 591 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 141
Parallax 137
103% 135 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 128
Splatting 106
90% 110 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 496 532 660 736 795 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 2,156
Write 1,155
Mixed 738
SusWrite 607
257% 1,164 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 61.2
219% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 1,036
DQ Write 791
DQ Mixed 898
676% 909 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 231%
Great: 353%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
147GB free
Firmware: 8EV10171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 288 305 369 403 431 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 549
Write 596
Mixed 455
SusWrite 342
109% 485 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 51.1
203% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 701
DQ Write 653
DQ Mixed 894
611% 749 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 135%
Great: 230%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 109 113 134 142 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 175
Write 155
Mixed 101
SusWrite 123
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 98%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$38
477GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 91 111 113 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 51.8
Write 110
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 102
53% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.8
329% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 108%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 173 173 180 181 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 194
Write 201
Mixed 123
SusWrite 176
233% 173 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3466C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,061
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback