Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 51.4 2-Core 103 47% 75.5 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 102 14% 101 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sapphire(174B E810) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	8.97% Terrible	Lighting 11.4 Reflection 9.73 Parallax 9.34 9% 10.2 fps	MRender 8.05 Gravity 8.3 Splatting 12.8 8% 9.72 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.97% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25 4,646 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: WT100-33 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 43 46 43 46 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 52.7 Write 57.9 Mixed 41 SusWrite 43.6 36% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 32%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 2GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 2GB free, PID 7788 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.34% Terrible	Read 5.7 Write 2.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 3.5 4% 3.55 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.34% Great: 3%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 6.9 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 97.7 41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	20x
Xeon X5470IntelBench 54%, 1,638 samples	16x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	9x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $161