Asus P5Q3 DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q3 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '18 at 16:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 81.2
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 101
50% 76.9 Pts
4-Core 89
8-Core 48.1
10% 68.6 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E810) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.97% Terrible
Lighting 11.5
Reflection 9.73
Parallax 9.34
9% 10.2 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 12.7
8% 9.68 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.97%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: WT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 45 46 48 49 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 52.9
Write 59.9
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 46.1
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 32%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 7788
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.7 3.5 3.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.5
4% 3.55 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 3%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
26.2% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q3 DELUXE Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q3 DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $161
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback