Lenovo 20017

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20017  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO KIWB1
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '18 at 22:09
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 60.8
37% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 62.1
8-Core 62
8% 62 Pts
64-Core 62.5
4% 62.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$60
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 106 116 117 119 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.9% Poor
Read 224
Write 131
Mixed 155
SusWrite 115
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 8.7
29% 8.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 55%
General UDisk 8GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 6.2 6.2 6 6.1 6.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 6
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 5.9
7% 6.28 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20017 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20017

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback