Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '18 at 18:34
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Memory 95.2 1-Core 115 2-Core 228 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 573 61% 485 Pts	64-Core 576 36% 576 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3714) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 119 Parallax 113 92% 115 fps	MRender 98.7 Gravity 104 Splatting 102 83% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 416GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 279 274 273 276 289 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 460 Mixed 352 SusWrite 280 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 95.5 4K Mixed 33 132% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 288 236% 336 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 84GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 188 210 300 298 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 353 Write 343 Mixed 308 SusWrite 229 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 37 137% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 227 171% 231 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 74GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 188 186 157 48 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 356 Write 345 Mixed 324 SusWrite 136 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 35.8 132% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 176 146% 211 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 126%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 42GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 206 209 205 203 183 MB/s Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.7% Good	Read 247 Write 210 Mixed 212 SusWrite 202 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 30.2 122% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 190 142% 188 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 410GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 237 234 232 233 230 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	74.6% Very good	Read 256 Write 244 Mixed 236 SusWrite 234 55% 243 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 35.9 134% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 198 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 133%
SanDisk SD SDDR-289 128GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 117GB free, PID b6ba Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 85.9 Write 50.1 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 73.1 76% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.5 158% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 39%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 186GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 32 32 33 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 35.1 Mixed 27.1 SusWrite 32.5 44% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB 8,984 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	61.2% Good	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 19.3 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 20.1 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 56.6 71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	833x
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	560x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	316x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	140x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	138x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	128x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	73x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	63x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	60x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $851

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16