Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '18 at 06:42
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 121
51% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 202
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 130F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 10.5
4% 6.86 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 8.67
Splatting 4.96
4% 5.56 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 63 60 55 53 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 122
Write 340
Mixed 134
SusWrite 82.6
39% 170 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 13.8
75% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 103
96% 153 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 82%
hp v165w 8GB
7GB free, PID 5307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.4 6.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 7
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 7.1
11% 9.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X Extreme4+ - $104

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback