Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$65 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 208 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 574 54% 448 Pts	64-Core 552 34% 552 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% EVGA(3842 2722) 1GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.42% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 3.81 3% 3.87 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 3.27 Splatting 5.17 4% 4.32 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.42% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 50 50 49 50 49 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 346 Write 269 Mixed 251 SusWrite 69.4 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 76.8 4K Mixed 26.5 114% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 165 151% 228 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.4% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 8.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	249x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	171x
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples	160x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	72x
LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 4,915 samples	56x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	55x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	79x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 3,905 samples	49x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 7,869 samples	42x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178