TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive401% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180501
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '18 at 22:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 76.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 235
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 926
82% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,276
79% 1,276 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 81.4%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 187
Parallax 166
127% 170 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 162
Splatting 116
107% 133 fps
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 117%
 Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 25 46 63 64 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
401% Outstanding
Read 4,884
Write 59.8
Mixed 140
SusWrite 44.6
267% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 497
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 8.6
766% 170 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑
This bench: 401%
 Great: 144%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
787GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 134 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 132
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 75.3%
 Great: 74%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB
50GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.9 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 23.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 2.3
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
78% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 10.2%
 Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSC.16FARG BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSC.16FARG BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 27.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 27.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 83.6%
 Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD  $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples97x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD  $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples59x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples58x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples29x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples17x
RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL  $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback