Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 10:55
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 419
55% 412 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
Gigabyte(1458 2554) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 51.1
31% 41.4 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 40.3
29% 34.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
69d03092-t A 80GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 330ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 73 70 69 61 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.5% Average
Read 156
Write 94.5
Mixed 118
SusWrite 71.2
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 24.9
99% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.8
DQ Write 49.2
DQ Mixed 22.9
21% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 42%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
172GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 96 95 95 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 95.5
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 94.5
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 61%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
83GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 54 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 65
Write 62.3
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 53.1
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 18.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback