Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-M WS (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170309
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '18 at 09:13
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$150 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Memory 91.8 1-Core 121 2-Core 246 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 498 8-Core 804 80% 651 Pts	64-Core 967 60% 967 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 121 Parallax 110 93% 115 fps	MRender 99.4 Gravity 105 Splatting 96.1 82% 100 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 201 214 215 211 211 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 489 Mixed 400 SusWrite 210 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 50.1 176% 63.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 353 266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 417GB free Firmware: EXM03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 203 215 216 211 212 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 487 Mixed 398 SusWrite 212 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 37.4 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 50.3 178% 64.7 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 352 266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 94GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 203 215 215 210 211 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 487 Mixed 410 SusWrite 211 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 56.3 194% 68.8 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 248 216% 321 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 126%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB 4,385 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 700GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 107 111 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	58% Above average	Read 92.2 Write 101 Mixed 32 SusWrite 110 61% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 151GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 72 74 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 69.3 Write 65.2 Mixed 54.7 SusWrite 73.2 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 167% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 30GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 65 62 65 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 108 Write 95.7 Mixed 63 SusWrite 63.7 61% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 68%
Seagate BUP SL 5TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 4TB free, PID ab30 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 130 132 136 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 129 Mixed 77 SusWrite 133 152% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.7 166% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 57%
Sony Hard Drive 1TB 2,286 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 31GB free, PID 05bf Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 111 Write 109 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 57.4 100% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB-$299 798 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 42.6 MC Write 43.2 MC Mixed 41.6 121% 42.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 21.7 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	39x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	23x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	17x
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	13x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	12x

SSD
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	5x

RAM
M393A1G40DB1-CRC 4x8GBSamsungBench 99%, 225 samples	7x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	6x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $452

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16