Asus P7P55D

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101214
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '18 at 20:18
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 96.9 1-Core 92.4 2-Core 185 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 370 50% 370 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 34FC) 1GB CLim: 715 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.4 Reflection 18 Parallax 13.8 13% 15.7 fps	MRender 21.8 Gravity 15.6 Splatting 18 15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 83GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 230 237 240 240 240 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.9% Above average	Read 254 Write 237 Mixed 205 SusWrite 236 53% 233 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 24.4 87% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 99.8 DQ Mixed 132 101% 139 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 452GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 565 262 259 261 261 261 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 78 77 75 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 84.9 Write 75.5 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 77.2 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	54% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 17.2 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 15.4 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 50.7 79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	398x
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	253x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	179x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	62x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	55x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	402x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	380x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	169x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16