Asus P7H55D-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7H55D-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 08 '18 at 18:42
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 661-$80
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 71.1
1-Core 80
2-Core 132
57% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 208
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 68.9
Parallax 96.4
58% 78.7 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 57.8
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
295GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 191 357 203 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
434GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 85 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 85.5
Write 74
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 85.3
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
81GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 120 118 111 107 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 111
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 71%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
353GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 110 111 113 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 112
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 13.7
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55D-M PRO Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $391
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback