Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory	60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '18 at 18:04
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1,642 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 181 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 647 58% 491 Pts	64-Core 1,623 100% 1,623 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.8% Above average	Lighting 64.5 Reflection 77.8 Parallax 67.2 53% 69.8 fps	MRender 74.3 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 63.7 56% 69.6 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 174 191 179 177 177 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57% Above average	Read 252 Write 242 Mixed 240 SusWrite 180 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 28.2 93% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 158 118% 158 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 128%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 108 107 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 114 Write 110 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 108 72% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A 8x8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 38.9 MC Mixed 34 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R920 POWER Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 01stBench 68%, 674 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	2x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $122Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	1x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x
SSDSC2CT080A4 80GBIntelBench 60%, 377 samples	1x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4A 8x8GBHynixBench 89%, 32 samples	2x
M393B1G73QH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 17 samples	1x
M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4... 64GBSamsungBench 84%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $122

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16