Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory	60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '18 at 17:28
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 1,642 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 85.1 2-Core 168 58% 127 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 575 55% 454 Pts	64-Core 1,634 101% 1,634 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.2% Below average	Lighting 26.9 Reflection 24.9 Parallax 57.8 22% 36.5 fps	MRender 64.4 Gravity 63.2 Splatting 54.8 49% 60.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 181 171 178 182 181 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.9% Below average	Read 222 Write 200 Mixed 211 SusWrite 181 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 13.2 4K Mixed 13 44% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 78 DQ Write 68 DQ Mixed 72.4 54% 72.8 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 128%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 102 106 109 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 109 Write 111 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 106 70% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A 8x8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	MC Read 0.8 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 1 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 0.6 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 1.2 8% 2.77 GB/s	Latency 1,135 4% 1,135 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R920 POWER Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 01stBench 68%, 674 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	2x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $122Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	1x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x
SSDSC2CT080A4 80GBIntelBench 60%, 377 samples	1x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4A 8x8GBHynixBench 89%, 32 samples	2x
M393B1G73QH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 17 samples	1x
M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4... 64GBSamsungBench 84%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $122

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16