Lenovo 20240

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20240  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '18 at 00:55
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 49.7
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 46.6
27% 39.8 Pts
4-Core 92.5
8-Core 93.9
12% 93.2 Pts
64-Core 94.3
6% 94.3 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Legend(17AA 3802) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.250.31.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 2.28
2% 2.78 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.17
2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 79 60 79 75 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 79.8
Write 78.3
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 70.9
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 63%
Generic Flash Udisk 8GB
7GB free, PID 1320
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2 1.9 2.6 2.9 2.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 0.3
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 2.5
5% 5.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 5.8
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20240 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback