TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3 R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-HD3 R4  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '18 at 15:21
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 251
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 691
65% 542 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 83.9%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1543 MHz, MLim: 1955 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.1% Good
Lighting 88.7
Reflection 88.1
Parallax 79.1
72% 85.3 fps
MRender 85.9
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 69.7
63% 78 fps
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 69.1%
 Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD753LJ 256GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1222A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 7.2 50 57 9.6 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 456
Write 220
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 41.5
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
36% 8.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 30.4%
 Great: 94%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
377GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 88 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 48
Mixed 62
SusWrite 90.5
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 52.4%
 Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 62%
 Great: 72%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B85M-HD3 R4 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-HD3 R4

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel  $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples56x
Core i5-4590Intel  $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples15x
Core i7-4790KIntel  $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples13x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples17x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples13x
SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston  $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples6x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples8x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples7x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback