bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150702
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 22:01
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.8% Poor
Memory 32
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 135
43% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 126
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) 1GB
Driver: vm3dum64.dll Ver. 8.15.1.33
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 4.03
2% 3.74 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.17
4% 4.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 64GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 52 35 56 67 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 144
Write 38.3
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 57.1
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 2.9
512% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 91%
Vmware, VMware Virtual S 500GB
17GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 37 32 62 69 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 87
Write 75.7
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 54.3
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
18.8% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 6.1
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 0.4
5% 1.6 GB/s
Latency 243
16% 243 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback