Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140620
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '18 at 10:36
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 182
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 475
51% 404 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1117) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 347.88
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 1.12
4% 3.49 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 4.47
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.39 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 90 63 63 63 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 289
Write 79.6
Mixed 118
SusWrite 68.6
30% 139 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 11.1
44% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 19.9
15% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 91 65 66 63 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 150
Write 158
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 72.1
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 114%
LaCie P9233 8TB
433GB free, PID 106f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 54 54 58 64 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 48.4
Write 78.9
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 59.1
84% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
166% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 76%
TOSHIBA STOR.E EDITION 1TB
776GB free, PID 0b1f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 45 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 88.8
Write 91
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 46.2
78% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24%
Great: 39%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
286GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 51 52 57 65 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 74.3
Write 78.5
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 58.1
78% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
311GB free, PID 6031
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 56 58 59 62 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 132
Write 124
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 60
119% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-017.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.3
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2PV Builds (Compare 2,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PV - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback