Asus H81M-D PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-D PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140515
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '18 at 18:59
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 80 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 198 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 329 43% 322 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 8A9B) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Lighting 23.3 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 21 19% 20.7 fps	MRender 25.9 Gravity 23 Splatting 17.6 18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 297 297 297 297 297 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 292 Mixed 276 SusWrite 296 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 94 4K Mixed 36.7 146% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 242 208% 308 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 128%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 858GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 186 186 185 185 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 180 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 184 107% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 2.1 383% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HC5N-DI 2x8GB 1,156 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.1% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 16.4 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 17.3 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-D PLUS Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D PLUS

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	74x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	69x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	46x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	43x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	25x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	19x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 49%, 28,220 samples	17x
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 2x8GBNanyaBench 55%, 1,721 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $360

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16