Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M730  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '18 at 10:27
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 166
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 591
56% 462 Pts
64-Core 1,162
72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310
Nvidia(10DE 094E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 331.65
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 512GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 232 229 175 184 122 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.8% Above average
Read 241
Write 224
Mixed 230
SusWrite 196
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 33.9
99% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 168
120% 154 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 105%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
766GB free
Firmware: KF06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 117 115 120 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 125
Write 122
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 116
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PDZ- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 51.4
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 42.7
131% 46 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M730 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $417
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback