Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142 1,083 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 166 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 591 56% 462 Pts	64-Core 1,162 72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310 4,920 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 094E) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 331.65 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 512GB 514 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: N101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 232 229 175 184 122 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.8% Above average	Read 241 Write 224 Mixed 230 SusWrite 196 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 33.9 99% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 168 120% 154 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 105%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25 5,893 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 766GB free Firmware: KF06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 117 115 120 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 125 Write 122 Mixed 91.6 SusWrite 116 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF1G72PDZ- 4x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 51.4 MC Write 43.8 MC Mixed 42.7 131% 46 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	13x
NVS 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,920 samples	7x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8C 4x4GBHynixBench 70%, 26 samples	8x
M393B1G73QH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 87%, 67 samples	4x
M393B2G70DB0- 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 461 samples	4x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $417