HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory45.5 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 01 '18 at 03:04
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon W5580
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 168
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 534
53% 434 Pts
64-Core 834
52% 834 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1556) 1GB
CLim: 951 MHz, MLim: 1089 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 9.75
9% 11.6 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 15.8
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 250GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 430 431 307 301 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 428
Mixed 422
SusWrite 344
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 41.1
136% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 250
190% 256 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 116%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 77 78 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 78.1
Write 71.2
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 75.6
53% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 80 109 177 179 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 167
Write 94.1
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 132
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
149GB free
Firmware: 3E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 102 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 102
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 97.1
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 AD HMT151R7AFP4C-H9 ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7AFP4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7AFP4C-H9 ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 A... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 19.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback