HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory45.4 GB free of 48.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '18 at 06:06
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon W5580
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 169
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 538
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 1556) 1GB
CLim: 951 MHz, MLim: 1089 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 9.66
9% 11.5 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 15.7
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 250GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.2% Below average
Read 136
Write 130
Mixed 133
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 12.3
48% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 94.3
DQ Write 92.2
DQ Mixed 9.81
30% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 116%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: AB51
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 84.3
Mixed 62.7
63% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.22
81% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 1A01
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 196
Write 84.7
Mixed 114
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.29
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.14
84% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
149GB free
Firmware: 3E02
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 95.4
Write 87
Mixed 89.1
68% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.38
101% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 AD HMT151R7AFP4C-H9 ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 AD HMT151R7TFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7AFP4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT151R7AFP4C-H9 ID:83 0B NT4GC72B4NA1NL-CG ID:80 A... 82GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.7% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback