Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '18 at 00:35
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 90.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 293
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 818
87% 695 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 121
Parallax 116
96% 118 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 107
Splatting 107
87% 105 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1481 1108 599 597 599 596 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,544
Write 1,573
Mixed 667
SusWrite 830
258% 1,153 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 234
4K Mixed 50.5
255% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 1,447
DQ Mixed 902
771% 1,113 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 242%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
59GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 274 274 274 218 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 454
Mixed 400
SusWrite 252
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 45.8
183% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 231
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 106%
Great: 118%
Adata S511 120GB
27GB free
Firmware: 3.3.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 131 132 125 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 369
Write 147
Mixed 197
SusWrite 127
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 36.8
154% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 162
122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
674GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 131 132 133 134 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 160
Write 129
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 130
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
674GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 89.5
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.8% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 17.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 20.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $766
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback