PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 9.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T3610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T3610 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170509 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jun 30 '18 at 14:15 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | ALB-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
65.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Asus(1043 0428) 3GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
9.42%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 44 48 33 54 53 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
49GB free
Firmware: 12.01B03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 47 51 33 55 53 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
204GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 121 123 122 123 MB/s
|
69.4%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 944x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 562x |
Xeon E5-1607 v2IntelBench 65%, 1,768 samples | 249x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 237x |
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 218x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 93x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $373 |