Today's hottest deals

Intelr AWRDACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemINTELR AWRDACPI
MotherboardIntelr AWRDACPI  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 15:43
Run Duration1303 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron M processor 1.00GHz
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 8.5
2-Core 8.6
25% 27.5 Pts
4-Core 8.4
8-Core 8.5
1% 8.45 Pts
64-Core 8.4
0% 8.4 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHW2040AT 40GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000000B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 29 28 25 30 29 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 22.5
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 26.1
17% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 16%
Verbatim STORE N GO 2GB
0GB free, PID 1f23
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 14.6
Write 7
Mixed 6
10% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
1024, 512 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
6.2% Terrible
MC Read 1.4
MC Write 1.5
MC Mixed 1.4
4% 1.43 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 1.1
SC Mixed 0.3
2% 0.63 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AWRDACPI Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intelr AWRDACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback