Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Huanan X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170628
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '18 at 09:28
Run Duration	104 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 204 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 517 56% 446 Pts	64-Core 515 32% 515 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 79%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 642GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 99 100 102 99 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 87.8 Write 86 Mixed 79.8 SusWrite 101 66% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0- 4x4GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 29.8 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 12 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 676 samples	5x
KRE-D3U1600M/ Dimm2_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1600M/ Dimm4_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1600M/ Dimm6_Manufacturer KRE-D3U1600M/ 16GBDimm0_ManufacturerBench 98%, 15 samples	5x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	3x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16