TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180501
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 06:15
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
80% 143 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 803
76% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,249
77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 83.9%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gigabyte(1458 3717)
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 136
Parallax 132
107% 133 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 127
Splatting 103
92% 113 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 450 304 247 250 250 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 427
Write 325
Mixed 381
SusWrite 322
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 35.9
119% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 322
243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 88.5%
 Great: 99%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 109 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 108
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 60.4%
 Great: 108%
WD Elements 1.5TB
462GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 36 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 28.3
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 35.2
43% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
121% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 21.3%
 Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 37.2
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 30.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD  $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples97x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD  $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples59x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples58x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples29x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples17x
RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL  $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback