Asus M2N-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2N-E  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081030
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '18 at 23:06
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 7850
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 93.8
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 69.7
47% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 65.1
8-Core 74.9
9% 70 Pts
64-Core 79.1
5% 79.1 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 372.70
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 63.5
52% 66.9 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 69.2
58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S3712 120GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 248
Write 199
Mixed 83.5
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 27.9
102% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 85
63% 85 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 49%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
246GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 116 114 119 119 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 117
Write 123
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 118
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST3500630SV 500GB
83GB free
Firmware: 3.AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 71 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 62.2
Write 62.5
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 72.7
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 44%
Corsair Voyager 3.0 128GB
72GB free, PID 1a03
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 25 14 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 18.1
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 19.4
32% 24.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 8.3
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.5
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-E Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback