HP h9-1182

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP h9-1182  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 27 '18 at 14:16
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 512
52% 423 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 273 258 256 262 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 1,022
Write 774
Mixed 473
SusWrite 289
142% 639 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 29.3
98% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 198
146% 192 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 531%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB
2TB free
Firmware: SND0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 192 197 180 196 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
653GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 153 148 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 116
Mixed 62.6
SusWrite 152
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 96%
Fantom External HDD 4TB
236GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47% Average
Read 161
Write 135
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 90.8
143% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
377GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 106 101 102 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 49
Write 87.7
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 106
108% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 0.6
317% 3.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 0.8
379% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73BH0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h9-1182 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP h9-1182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback