Asus H81M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-D  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '18 at 07:52
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 95
2-Core 187
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 348
46% 348 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.5% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 37
35% 40.6 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 33.7
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1015A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 60 55 49 59 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 384
Mixed 357
SusWrite 90.2
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 50
169% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 241
202% 291 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 91%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
8GB free, PID a82d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Read 6.8
Write 0.2
Mixed 44
SusWrite 6.4
22% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
128% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 10.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-D Builds (Compare 833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback