Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '18 at 00:27
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 101
2-Core 195
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 740
68% 566 Pts
64-Core 1,076
67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 67.8
Parallax 60.4
57% 66.2 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 67
Splatting 70.4
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
140GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 415
Mixed 429
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 23.3
135% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 43.9
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 23.9
44% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 126
Write 111
Mixed 113
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.1
50% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 107%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
2TB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 136
Write 113
Mixed 101
145% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.51
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 0.69
398% 4.35 MB/s
DQ Read 0.93
DQ Write 2.07
DQ Mixed 0.35
86% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 28.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback