HP Z230 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Z230 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1905
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1862 x 1048 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161018
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '18 at 19:58
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
70% 128 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 407
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 3GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
8.5% Terrible
Lighting 9.57
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 8.06
8% 9.65 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 9.87
Splatting 12.8
10% 12 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 8.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56% Above average
Read 270
Write 166
Mixed 200
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 16.5
109% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 30.1
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 17.2
30% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
332GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44% Average
Read 76.1
Write 76
Mixed 11.8
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 4.97
4K Mixed 0.34
154% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44%
Great: 63%
SABRENT 1.5TB
35GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 28.1
Write 26.5
Mixed 9.05
25% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.34
60% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA1339A.C16 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 1315 CT25664BA1339A.C16 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z230 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 2,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z230 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback