Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161118
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 23 '18 at 09:07
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 50
2-Core 96.4
50% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 200
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 1288) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 397.93
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 11.9
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 13.2
11% 13 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
R5SL120G 120GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0114 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 195
Write 209
Mixed 247
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 3.78
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 6.43
39% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 91.7
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 9.92
36% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 89%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30
72GB free
Firmware: CC2H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 65
Mixed 89.1
56% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.18
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.23
48% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 65%
WDC WD5000LPCX-2 500GB
140GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 79.2
Write 82.5
Mixed 72.9
101% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.22
67% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.3% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.4
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback