Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Gigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180420
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '18 at 12:14
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Memory 94 1-Core 137 2-Core 270 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 910 88% 721 Pts	64-Core 1,135 70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 100%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6094 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.53% Terrible	Lighting 7.13 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 8.84 6% 9.58 fps	MRender 13 Gravity 7.83 Splatting 17.4 11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.53% Great: 7%
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 36FC) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.8% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 112 Parallax 95.7 83% 103 fps	MRender 97.4 Gravity 94.4 Splatting 98.4 79% 96.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 124GB free Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 1,573 Write 552 Mixed 834 216% 986 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 24.3 131% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 24 101% 226 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 144%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 14326726 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 -11905649340306 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 586 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 111 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 51 51542949915 (C2) HDA temperature 27 51 51542949915 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 14326726 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 14326726 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 14326726 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3396 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6551 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6551 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11124 (F4) Unknown 97 97 7340137	62.1% Good	Read 510 Write 187 Mixed 248 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 86.7 4K Mixed 11.4 97% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 86.8 DQ Mixed 50.1 41% 55.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 85%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 49GB free Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3432583 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 -54322746349499 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1404 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 449 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 47 64427589656 (C2) HDA temperature 24 47 64427589656 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3432583 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3432583 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3432583 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 65 65 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 147055 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5415 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5415 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4248 (F4) Unknown 63 63 73598051	56.5% Above average	Read 510 Write 98 Mixed 143 54% 250 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 88.7 4K Mixed 11.5 95% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 26.7 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 10.7 24% 47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x4GB 11,542 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	75.6% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 23.7 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 24.5 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	476x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	348x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	266x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	166x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	161x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	150x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	113x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	47x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	133x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 76%, 20,001 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $524

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16