Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-R (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160526
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '18 at 20:57
Run Duration	517 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$40 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	49% Average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 149 56% 96.6 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 201 24% 184 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85C7) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	8.97% Terrible	Lighting 10.3 Reflection 0.04 Parallax 9.72 8% 6.7 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 12.5 Splatting 12.8 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 8.97% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 283GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 65536 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698548 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1005 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2560 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1005 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1006 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1006 (C2) HDA temperature 136 136 206158757932 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	73.8% Very good	Read 118 Write 140 Mixed 74.2 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.06 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.11 38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-033.A00G 2x4GB 275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.8 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 14.7 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	925x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	375x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	273x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	526x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	340x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	304x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	246x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	144x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	114x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	94x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16