HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180212
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '18 at 12:21
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 184 65% 115 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 364 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 3396) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 1.44 2% 1.74 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 3.7 2% 2.84 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17251 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 9589 (B1) Unknown 62 62 460 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 47 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 8428 (F1) Unknown 99 99 68093067792	64.8% Good	Read 478 Write 248 Mixed 228 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 12.5 87% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 79.6 DQ Mixed 18.1 42% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 85%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 804GB free Firmware: JP4OA39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 589834 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 93 (03) Spinup time 122 122 25790447923 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 9701 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 34 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 44192 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1187 (C0) Power-off retract count 91 91 10922 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 10922 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 219043921960 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 4 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	73.4% Very good	Read 132 Write 124 Mixed 117 93% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.36 85% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 625GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 132267216 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9958 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 4300859959 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 17664 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2426 (B7) Unknown 75 75 25 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4307419326 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 62 55 639434790 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 419 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 71 71 58378 (C2) HDA temperature 38 45 47244640294 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -65541200931807 (F1) Unknown 100 253 33769746341856 (F2) Unknown 100 253 108393093972148	90.7% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 160 Mixed 142 115% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.28 93% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 3x4GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.4% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 9.6 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 8.2 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,041x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	965x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	400x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	380x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	336x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	48x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16