bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System
Motherboard	Intel DH61CR
Memory	8.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '18 at 22:49
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155 CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 102 2-Core 201 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 397 53% 397 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Lighting 78.2 Reflection 78.3 Parallax 74.6 64% 77 fps	MRender 69.5 Gravity 70.3 Splatting 72.4 58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GB 1,925 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 34GB free Firmware: EXT09H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 2493 (0B) Calibration retry count 99 99 133 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1685 (AA) Unknown 99 99 2183 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 371785736 (AE) Unknown 99 99 133 (B7) Unknown 99 99 723 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 82 82 302710802 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	48.1% Average	Read 265 Write 251 Mixed 253 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 13.2 69% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 51.5 DQ Mixed 12.4 17% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 88%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2959 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2916 (B1) Unknown 96 96 47 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 81 43 19 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 274 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21082675031	48.4% Average	Read 263 Write 178 Mixed 182 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 15.1 79% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 14.9 31% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 118%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 355GB free Firmware: 2BA30010 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 89 89 3564 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1446 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1099 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 6 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 974 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 68 (C2) HDA temperature 64 62 163209347085 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 69 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 6 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 53318	54.4% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 97.7 Mixed 92.5 71% 94 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.37 101% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.7% Below average	MC Read 10 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,026x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,571x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	934x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,041x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	517x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16