ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4220W8Q

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 4220W8Q (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '16 at 21:29
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 69.8 1-Core 84.1 2-Core 142 58% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 211 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1800 6,394 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 062C) 768MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	4.04% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 7 Parallax 1.66 4% 4.55 fps	MRender 7.05 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 4.39 4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.04% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.03E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 136 132 4200 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1304 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6177 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1292 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 124 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1304 (C2) HDA temperature 110 104 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.5% Average	Read 70.4 Write 74 Mixed 23.8 41% 56 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.39 95% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS724040KLSA80 400GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 58GB free Firmware: KFABC4AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 99 99 34405679817 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1087 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 45322 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 926 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2737 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2737 (C2) HDA temperature 141 141 244813791271 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	17.8% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 28.4 Mixed 30.9 23% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.22 68% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR1870ED48E8F1333 2x2GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 13.5 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback