Asrock Z77 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 23:18
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2550K-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 361
48% 361 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Lighting 75.1
Reflection 76
Parallax 72.5
61% 74.5 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 69.4
56% 69 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 650 120GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT01B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 507
Write 435
Mixed 479
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 20
88% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 85
DQ Mixed 54.1
62% 109 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 84%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
817GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 94.2
Write 66.7
Mixed 96.2
65% 85.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.26
70% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
410GB free
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 112
Write 66.3
Mixed 79.9
65% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.35
74% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 88%
Leef Ice 3 32GB
27GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 144
Write 28.8
Mixed 95.2
98% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.06
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.76
88% 2.66 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro3 Builds (Compare 1,291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro3 - $212

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback