Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '18 at 19:12
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$189 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Memory 91 1-Core 127 2-Core 246 87% 155 Pts	4-Core 476 8-Core 724 74% 600 Pts	64-Core 1005 62% 1005 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 136 Parallax 135 111% 136 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 129 Splatting 106 94% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	220% Outstanding	Read 2,059 Write 1,246 Mixed 1,245 335% 1,516 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 99.4 4K Mixed 33.2 172% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 22 77% 172 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 220% Great: 236%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1TB free Firmware: 1AA01114 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 96 5 (03) Spinup time 87 87 4880 (04) Start/Stop count 72 72 28188 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 26 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 11435 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 34143 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 5 (0C) Power cycle count 77 77 22867 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 96 5 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 311 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 61 572653602 (C2) HDA temperature 67 60 572588065 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 44993 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 18 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 98 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	61.5% Good	Read 108 Write 106 Mixed 101 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.57 4K Mixed 0.49 123% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 63%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 103 78 179885229 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 13059 (05) Reallocated sector count 63 63 1530 (07) Seek error rate 90 60 1271225569 (09) Power-on hours count 35 35 57247 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 478 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1108 (BC) Unknown 100 97 60130459667 (BD) vendor-specific 85 85 15 (BE) vendor-specific 67 35 17764557324321 (C2) HDA temperature 33 65 55834574881 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 41 37 179885229 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	61.1% Good	Read 104 Write 109 Mixed 104 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.41 4K Mixed 0.44 120% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 60%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB 17,984 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1TB free Firmware: 10.02E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 188 185 5558 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2208 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6690 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 827 (BE) vendor-specific 60 41 40 (C2) HDA temperature 110 91 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	62.5% Good	Read 106 Write 112 Mixed 99.6 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.39 4K Mixed 0.43 118% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 35%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70 66,332 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 312GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 127457640 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 630 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 68 60 6610782 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1197 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 267 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 64 60 623116324 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 18 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3382 (C2) HDA temperature 36 40 64424509476 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -32083405700288 (F1) Unknown 100 253 7360101751 (F2) Unknown 100 253 56386440751	81.4% Excellent	Read 104 Write 179 Mixed 157 111% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 5.25 4K Mixed 0.72 213% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3600 C16 Series 2x8GB 590 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3534 MHz clocked @ 1767 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 46.6 MC Write 40.8 MC Mixed 35.7 117% 41 GB/s	SC Read 26.3 SC Write 42.1 SC Mixed 30.3 94% 32.9 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,439x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $179Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	307x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	283x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	234x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	178x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	203x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $809

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)