Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101116
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '18 at 15:25
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 163 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 411 44% 353 Pts	64-Core 410 25% 410 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Lighting 37 Reflection 27.1 Parallax 34 30% 32.7 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 34.5 Splatting 33.8 29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 21192 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1887 (B1) Unknown 84 84 189 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 58 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1877 (F1) Unknown 99 99 70218633881	50.4% Above average	Read 367 Write 157 Mixed 194 52% 240 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 14.9 78% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 33.7 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 24.2 32% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 118%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 195GB free Firmware: JP4O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 87 87 1441860 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 100 (03) Spinup time 122 122 25790120247 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7242 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 25 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 144 144 28 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 29183 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3635 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7911 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7911 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 171799740450 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 25 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	45.7% Average	Read 81.6 Write 77.7 Mixed 95.1 64% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.28 68% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 74%
TOSHIBA DT01ABA300 3TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 93.7 Write 108 Mixed 60.9 111% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.15 62% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	42.7% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 15.8 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 11.2 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	608x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	296x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	89x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	80x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	312x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	254x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	190x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16