ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X550IU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Asus X550IU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X550IU
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180330
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '18 at 00:15
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	49.3% Average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 67 2-Core 121 50% 83.8 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 194 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 14A0) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	8.63% Terrible	Lighting 10.8 Reflection 11.7 Parallax 13.8 9% 12.1 fps	MRender 8.76 Gravity 10.9 Splatting 10.7 8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.63% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 754GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX0R5J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1764 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4660 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 1261 (0A) Spinup retry count 192 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 766 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 202 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 8173 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 193274183711 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 98 98 1111 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 188 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	57.2% Above average	Read 97.5 Write 102 Mixed 96.6 74% 98.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.16 58% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 62%
Multiple Card Reader 16GB 2,333 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 11GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	9.96% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 11.6 Mixed 13 17% 14.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.14 95% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.96% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-008.A00G Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 16GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.9% Below average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 17.1 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical X550IU Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X550IU

CPU
FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 40%, 4,052 samples	39x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	38x
Radeon RX 460 GraphicsAMDBench 21%, 6 samples	1x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	7x
SSD 256GBBench 72%, 6,980 samples	1x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	1x

RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 4,400 samples	10x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	8x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback