HP HPE-315be

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP HPE-315be  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '18 at 16:21
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 88.2
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 82
55% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 264
26% 215 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Sapphire(174B 186B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 16.8
15% 17.3 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 19.3
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280-240GB 240GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P041 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
77.1% Very good
Read 264
Write 258
Mixed 230
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 44
136% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 94.4
93% 149 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 27.8
Mixed 14.2
29% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.19
59% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. C289 KRE-D3U1333M/4G0 9B852C80 BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 2C802C80 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.5
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-315be Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP HPE-315be

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $458
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback