Toshiba PORTAGE X30-D

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba PORTAGE X30-D (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Repair PCB
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171204
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '18 at 14:15
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	EUR-User
Background CPU	34%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7500U 139,101 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 167 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 239 32% 236 Pts	64-Core 243 15% 243 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Toshiba(1179 0005) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	5.69% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 7.88 Parallax 6 5% 6.69 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 5.57 Splatting 12.3 7% 7.91 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.69% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNK512GVN8 512GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 305GB free (System drive) Firmware: K8TA4101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1168 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1853 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 195 195 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 87 (C2) HDA temperature 48 39 261993594932 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 138435 (F2) Unknown 100 100 113306 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	76.5% Very good	Read 504 Write 247 Mixed 325 79% 359 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 24 100% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 52.5 91% 181 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 85%
SAMSUNG MZNTE256HMHP-000 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 63GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.3% Very good	Read 40.8 Write 37.5 Mixed 40.4 51% 39.6 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 18.3 4K Mixed 7.62 928% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 12.9 DQ Write 19 DQ Mixed 7.75 957% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB 36,753 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.3% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.1 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba PORTAGE X30-D

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)